|
Alicia keys bisexual, delanie aka darlene amaro, aly michalka, larter ali, alyson lee hannigan boob job
|
|
alicia keys bisexual -> hot alicia silverstone |
Posted: 10 17 2009 Post subject: ali larter home |
|
|
| Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins |
| akon smack that :: alicia silverstone lost weight |
| Author |
Message |
Jeejesh
Guest
|
Posted: 10 16 2009 Post subject: alex rodriguez naked |
|
|
That must have been Chuck Norris's craw-fish.
The cake is filled with used syringes and powdered cocaine for authenticity.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leesa
Guest
|
Posted: 10 15 2009 Post subject: alicia keys bisexual |
|
|
|
“That's what she said
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Mitchellson
Guest
|
Posted: 10 14 2009 Post subject: Online casinos free play |
|
|
@j035u5Because they now have much less succesful shows in preferential time-slots.Well that's not really a reason, is it? I was trying to point out precisely how senseless fox is.But I'll give you the explanation you seek (and this goes for all tv channels, but it's specially an issue in Fox because it's not been the first and certainly not the last epic show they've cancelled for no good reason (that they hadn'r provoked), and most of them even had great audiences:As I understand, every x amount of time fox execs are changed. This is mainly due to calm down the shareholders who want someone to be sacrificed when the network if not doing great on ratings (which is normally isn't).So every new exec get to approve new shows, right? some of them become their pet shows, the one's they're supposed to set them apart from the previous execs and help them maintain their position for longer. But then they have the problem that previous execs' pet shows are on the best time slots, and they can't just go and cancel their best audienced shows, that'd be carreer suicide...So what they do is move them around. It doesn't really matter too much to where, but their final destination is always friday nights. Where they lose ***** of viewers and that's how they get them cancelled. And put their own (more often crappy than not) pet shows on neutral time slots, and with time end up moving them to the best slots. But since they're not usually the GREATEST of shows, they don't do great compared to other networks, and alas, he is fired, a new exec is promoted and the cycle starts all over again. They couldn't care less not only about the viewers, but also about the actual wellbeing of the company. Shareholders don't undertand time slots, they don't get what show would make it. They don't make direct decisions. They hire someone who they think will do the best job possible. Arrested Develpment, I agree, may not have been super-mainstream, but they have a HUGE fanbase, die-hard and crazy loyal. I wouldn't know about all the advertisement, since I (like MANY others) found out about it when it was already cancelled. There is DEFINITELY a place for shows like that on TV (check battlestar galactica and similars). AD is not the best example, but other shows that WERE very mainstream also got cancelled. T:TSCC had lost viewers due to slacker writers, but it definitely started out good, and sure as hell ended up well. If it hadn't been cancelled I can bet you the 3rd season premiere would have beaten records.I could go on about other shows, but I'm sure many would do a better job. Firefly has also kind of niche, but could have definitely used the help of some promotion to younger audiences. The Serenity movie and DVD sales prove how succesful they could have been if they had been managed by less clueless and self-absorbed execs...Bah, whatever... broadcast tv is definitely not going to stay the same, and I predict as decisions are taken away from white-collar execs, and the industry stops being all about time slots, the number of quality shows will go up dramatically.Just wait and see.
In Canada we already taken precautions for this a few weeks ago by sending aboriginal people some antiseptic soap and body bags.http://www.cbc.ca/canada/manitoba/story/2009/09/17 ...!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Pathum Kossinna
Guest
|
Posted: 10 12 2009 Post subject: alicia keys bisexual |
|
|
If people are willing to shell over $80+ a month on a plan they shouldn't be too concerned about $99 vs. $199. The choice for me is easy, AT&T vs Verizon. Me personally, AT&T could give away the iphone and i still wouldn't pick them and their crappy service.?
Mark Whalberg is an automatic digg. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Jonine
Guest
|
Posted: 10 11 2009 Post subject: who is alicia keys boyfriend |
|
|
god damn that's old.

|
|
| Back to top |
|
Page
Guest
|
Posted: 10 10 2009 Post subject: alicia keys ass |
|
|
|
It's a transport ship. Since we aren't currently at war with any countries that have a Navy, it wont really see any combat (not that it would be wise to send a ship that does not have any cannons into combat anyway).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Labitad
Guest
|
Posted: 09 12 2009 Post subject: alicia keys height |
|
|
|
All gods are false, silly-billy!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Randall
Guest
|
Posted: 09 09 2009 Post subject: alicia keys bisexual |
|
|
|
!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Elie
Guest
|
Oh, of *course* /sYou believe that because you are a partisan hack. The stimulus is obviously working, but because you're a Republican, you have to deny it. |
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| 9 User(s) are reading this topic (8 Guests and 40 Anonymous Users) |
|
 |
|
|
All times are GMT - 3 Hours
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|